Outcome: Dismissed
AUG232021_06B5203
Our summary
Urban planning researcher with PhD sought NIW for research in sustainable urban planning and environmental justice. AAO affirmed Director's denial: first prong met but second prong failed because petitioner lacked evidence of success, implementation, or influence in the field despite research experience and publications.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Merit and national importance · Director and AAO agreed proposed research in sustainable urban planning, public health, climate change has substantial merit and national importance
What was missing
- Well positioned · Petitioner lacked demonstrated success or implementation record; letters of support insufficient without evidence of field influence or progress
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director and AAO agreed proposed research in sustainable urban planning, public health, climate change has substantial merit and national importance | |
| Not met | Petitioner lacked demonstrated success or implementation record; letters of support insufficient without evidence of field influence or progress | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Second prong failed; third prong analysis unnecessary and not reached |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
