Outcome: Dismissed
AUG232022_01B2203
Our summary
Art curator and architect sought EB-1A classification. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner met only two of six claimed criteria. Petitioner failed to establish three criteria minimum and abandoned architecture for art curation and fashion accessories, showing insufficient intent to continue in claimed field of extraordinary ability.
Official PDF
The official PDF link for this decision is being verified.
Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Exhibitions · Submitted sufficient evidence of display at artistic exhibitions
- Judging · Served on juries at municipal museum and exhibition selection
What was missing
- Awards · Submitted prize not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized
- High salary · Letter did not provide sufficient information for field comparison
- Leading or critical role · Founded studio but did not establish distinguished reputation through documentation
- Published material · Publications not in major trade publications or major media
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Submitted sufficient evidence of display at artistic exhibitions | |
| Met | Served on juries at municipal museum and exhibition selection | |
| Not met | Submitted prize not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized | |
| Not met | Letter did not provide sufficient information for field comparison | |
| Not met | Founded studio but did not establish distinguished reputation through documentation | |
| Not met | Publications not in major trade publications or major media | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Did not meet initial three criteria requirement; also abandoned field of architecture |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
