Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AFilm, music, performing artsDecided 2012Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

Aug152012_01B2203

Leading or critical roleNot metOriginal contributionsNot metPublished materialNot metAwardsClaimed, not analyzedJudgingClaimed, not analyzedMembershipClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzed

Our summary

A film director and writer sought extraordinary ability classification, with counsel never clearly tying evidence to specific criteria. The AAO found counsel failed to identify which criteria applied, treated a director's misstatement of field as harmless, and dismissed the appeal because the petitioner did not carry the burden of proof.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Leading or critical role · Director's finding of insufficient evidence was not shown to be erroneous; counsel gave no specific explanation on appeal.
  • Original contributions · Director's finding of insufficient evidence was not shown to be erroneous; counsel gave no specific explanation on appeal.
  • Published material · Counsel did not contest this criterion on appeal, and submitted items lacked required elements such as author identification.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Leading or critical roleNot metDirector's finding of insufficient evidence was not shown to be erroneous; counsel gave no specific explanation on appeal.
Original contributionsNot metDirector's finding of insufficient evidence was not shown to be erroneous; counsel gave no specific explanation on appeal.
Published materialNot metCounsel did not contest this criterion on appeal, and submitted items lacked required elements such as author identification.
AwardsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; director noted no evidence was submitted.
JudgingClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; director noted no evidence was submitted.
MembershipClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed in the appellate discussion.
Scholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; director noted no evidence was submitted.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.