An accountant sought EB-2 classification as an advanced degree professional or exceptional ability individual, with a national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the occupation and endeavor were not sufficiently identified and exceptional ability was not shown, then declined to reach the waiver. This is not a Dhanasar waiver decision.

Business executive and entrepreneur sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. Director found two criteria met but AAO found decision conclusory on several criteria claimed. AAO remanded for fuller analysis of awards, membership, judging, original contributions, and salary, with instructions for final merits review if three criteria satisfied.

Individual initially claimed entrepreneur status via luxury car service; later asserted agriculture field. AAO found occupational field description inconsistent and insufficient; could not determine exceptional ability level. Failed to meet EB-2 threshold; NIW analysis declined as issue dispositive.

A university petitioned to extend O-1A classification for an assistant coach. The appeal was dismissed because the beneficiary failed to demonstrate three required evidentiary criteria; membership claim lacked evidence that the association selected members based on outstanding achievements as judged by recognized experts.