Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AOtherIndividualDecided 2005Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

DEC132005_04B2203

AwardsNot metCommercial successNot metExhibitionsNot metHigh salaryNot metJudgingNot metLeading or critical roleNot metMembershipNot metOriginal contributionsNot metPublished materialNot metScholarly articlesNot metFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Tile and stone fabricator-installer seeking EB-1A classification. Self-represented petitioner claimed beneficiary reached level to work unsupervised and offered photographs. AAO found no evidence meeting any of ten regulatory criteria and no documentation of sustained national or international acclaim; petition dismissed.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Awards · No evidence of nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
  • Commercial success · No evidence of commercial success in relevant field
  • Exhibitions · No evidence of work displayed at artistic exhibitions or showcases
  • High salary · Blank pay stub submitted; no evidence of high remuneration
  • Judging · No evidence of participation as judge of others' work
  • Leading or critical role · No evidence of leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
  • Membership · No evidence of membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
  • Original contributions · No evidence of original contributions of major significance
  • Published material · No published material about petitioner in professional or major publications
  • Scholarly articles · No evidence of authorship of scholarly articles
  • Final merits · Record does not establish sustained national or international acclaim at very top level

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsNot metNo evidence of nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Commercial successNot metNo evidence of commercial success in relevant field
ExhibitionsNot metNo evidence of work displayed at artistic exhibitions or showcases
High salaryNot metBlank pay stub submitted; no evidence of high remuneration
JudgingNot metNo evidence of participation as judge of others' work
Leading or critical roleNot metNo evidence of leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
MembershipNot metNo evidence of membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Original contributionsNot metNo evidence of original contributions of major significance
Published materialNot metNo published material about petitioner in professional or major publications
Scholarly articlesNot metNo evidence of authorship of scholarly articles
Final meritsNot metRecord does not establish sustained national or international acclaim at very top level

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.