Outcome: Dismissed
DEC142017_02B2203
Our summary
A representational painter conducting collaborative shows sought EB-1A classification in the arts. The petitioner met only two of three required criteria: published material and exhibitions. Original contributions claim failed because sales and local gallery success do not demonstrate impact on the field as a whole. Petitioner also failed to show intent to continue work in visual arts. Appeal dismissed.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Exhibitions · Work displayed at recognized artistic exhibitions and showcases
- Published material · Director found published material in professional publications relating to her work
What was missing
- Original contributions · Artwork sales and local gallery impact do not demonstrate major significance in field as a whole
- Final merits · Aggregate record does not support established level of expertise required for classification
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Work displayed at recognized artistic exhibitions and showcases | |
| Met | Director found published material in professional publications relating to her work | |
| Not met | Artwork sales and local gallery impact do not demonstrate major significance in field as a whole | |
| Not met | Aggregate record does not support established level of expertise required for classification |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
