Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AArts, design, architectureIndividualDecided 2017Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

DEC142017_02B2203

ExhibitionsMetPublished materialMetOriginal contributionsNot metFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A representational painter conducting collaborative shows sought EB-1A classification in the arts. The petitioner met only two of three required criteria: published material and exhibitions. Original contributions claim failed because sales and local gallery success do not demonstrate impact on the field as a whole. Petitioner also failed to show intent to continue work in visual arts. Appeal dismissed.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Exhibitions · Work displayed at recognized artistic exhibitions and showcases
  • Published material · Director found published material in professional publications relating to her work

What was missing

  • Original contributions · Artwork sales and local gallery impact do not demonstrate major significance in field as a whole
  • Final merits · Aggregate record does not support established level of expertise required for classification

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
ExhibitionsMetWork displayed at recognized artistic exhibitions and showcases
Published materialMetDirector found published material in professional publications relating to her work
Original contributionsNot metArtwork sales and local gallery impact do not demonstrate major significance in field as a whole
Final meritsNot metAggregate record does not support established level of expertise required for classification

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.