Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AArts, design, architectureIndividualDecided January 2020Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JAN162020_03B2203

ExhibitionsMetAwardsNot metMembershipNot metPublished materialNot metFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A carpet weaver claimed six EB-1A criteria beyond the one found met (exhibitions). AAO affirmed one criterion met but rejected others: awards lacked documentation of international recognition, membership documentation was conclusory, publication lacked major media status. Only exhibitions criterion satisfied, but three required; appeal dismissed.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Exhibitions · Record shows rugs displayed at artistic exhibitions including international Central Asia event

What was missing

  • Awards · Regional prize claimed as international; supporting documents lack award significance details, criteria, or recipient information
  • Membership · Association membership claimed but no credible evidence of membership requirements judged by recognized experts
  • Published material · Article properly translated but publication lacks evidence of high circulation or status as major media
  • Final merits · One criterion met insufficient; record lacks evidence of sustained national or international acclaim or top-of-field status

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
ExhibitionsMetRecord shows rugs displayed at artistic exhibitions including international Central Asia event
AwardsNot metRegional prize claimed as international; supporting documents lack award significance details, criteria, or recipient information
MembershipNot metAssociation membership claimed but no credible evidence of membership requirements judged by recognized experts
Published materialNot metArticle properly translated but publication lacks evidence of high circulation or status as major media
Final meritsNot metOne criterion met insufficient; record lacks evidence of sustained national or international acclaim or top-of-field status

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.