EB-1AOtherIndividualDecided 2005Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
DEC192005_07B2203
AwardsNot metMembershipNot metFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
Self-represented petitioner claiming extraordinary ability based on youth awards and association membership from China. AAO found awards limited to provincial recognition, lacked competition documentation, membership evaluation was local or regional only, and petitioner submitted no evidence of intent to continue work in the United States.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Youth awards from 1990-2000 ages 6-16 without evidence of comprehensive competition results or degree of national or international recognition
- Membership · Association membership lacks evidence of outstanding achievement requirement or national or international expert evaluation
- Final merits · No evidence submitted that petitioner intends to continue work in field in United States
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Awards | Not met | Youth awards from 1990-2000 ages 6-16 without evidence of comprehensive competition results or degree of national or international recognition |
 Membership | Not met | Association membership lacks evidence of outstanding achievement requirement or national or international expert evaluation |
 Final merits | Not met | No evidence submitted that petitioner intends to continue work in field in United States |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.