Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AArts, design, architectureIndividualDecided December 2020Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

DEC302020_01B2203

AwardsNot metMembershipNot metOriginal contributionsNot metPublished materialNot metExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A reggae guitarist filed for EB-1A extraordinary ability claiming six criteria. The AAO affirmed the director's finding that the petitioner met only one criterion and dismissed the appeal, holding the remaining evidence insufficient to establish either a one-time achievement or three qualifying criteria.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Awards · Award went to band as whole; petitioner not shown as personal recipient.
  • Membership · SACVEN membership not shown to require outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts.
  • Original contributions · Specific original artistic contributions and their significance not identified or established.
  • Published material · Published material in professional or major media not documented with required details.
  • Final merits · Evidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or top of field.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsNot metAward went to band as whole; petitioner not shown as personal recipient.
MembershipNot metSACVEN membership not shown to require outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts.
Original contributionsNot metSpecific original artistic contributions and their significance not identified or established.
Published materialNot metPublished material in professional or major media not documented with required details.
ExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; decision reserved this issue.
Final meritsNot metEvidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or top of field.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.