EB-1AOtherIndividualDecided 2006Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
Dec152006_03B2203
AwardsNot metFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
Self-petitioner claimed extraordinary ability under EB-1A but failed to demonstrate either a major award or three regulatory criteria. The AAO upheld the director's finding that the petitioner lacks the sustained national or international acclaim required for this classification.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Petitioner failed to demonstrate receipt of major internationally recognized award
- Final merits · Petitioner did not meet at least three criteria and lacks sustained national or international acclaim
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Awards | Not met | Petitioner failed to demonstrate receipt of major internationally recognized award |
 Final merits | Not met | Petitioner did not meet at least three criteria and lacks sustained national or international acclaim |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.