Outcome: Dismissed
Dec182012_02B2203
Our summary
A film artist self-petitioner met the lesser nationally recognized prizes criterion but failed the membership criterion by claiming eligibility based on a single association without documentary support for criterion elements. With only one criterion satisfied, the AAO dismissed the appeal for insufficient evidence of extraordinary ability.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Awards · Petitioner submitted sufficient documentary evidence of two lesser nationally recognized prizes for excellence
What was missing
- Membership · Regulation requires membership in plural associations; petitioner only claimed membership in one association and failed to demonstrate it meets criterion elements
- Final merits · Although petitioner met awards criterion, failed to establish three criteria total; insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Petitioner submitted sufficient documentary evidence of two lesser nationally recognized prizes for excellence | |
| Not met | Regulation requires membership in plural associations; petitioner only claimed membership in one association and failed to demonstrate it meets criterion elements | |
| Not met | Although petitioner met awards criterion, failed to establish three criteria total; insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
