Self-petitioner writer claiming extraordinary ability under EB-1A. Appeal summarily dismissed because petitioner failed to submit any brief, additional evidence, or specific arguments addressing the service center's reasons for denial within six months of filing.

Artist seeking EB-1A classification for extraordinary ability claimed to meet regulatory criteria but failed to challenge director's denial, provide specific responses to findings, or submit promised brief and evidence within required timeframe. Appeal dismissed.

A petitioner sought extraordinary ability classification for a beneficiary in the sciences but failed to file a detailed appeal brief within thirty days as promised. The AAO summarily dismissed the appeal for lack of specific identification of errors and failure to submit additional supporting documentation.

A marketing manager specializing in search engine optimization was proposed by a company for O-1A extraordinary ability in business. The appeal was summarily dismissed because the filing named no specific error of law or fact and the promised brief or evidence never arrived.