Outcome: Dismissed
FEB022023_05B5203
Our summary
A banker sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver for financial advisory work. The AAO found the petitioner failed to establish the first Dhanasar prong by providing only vague possibilities rather than a specific, detailed endeavor with national importance, and failed the second prong.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Merit and national importance · Petitioner provided vague assertions about potential client base and economic impact without sufficient detail or specificity about proposed endeavor
- Well positioned · Petitioner's education unrelated to banking endeavor; certifications obtained after petition filing; eligibility required at time of filing
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Petitioner provided vague assertions about potential client base and economic impact without sufficient detail or specificity about proposed endeavor | |
| Not met | Petitioner's education unrelated to banking endeavor; certifications obtained after petition filing; eligibility required at time of filing | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Petitioner failed first and second prongs; court reserved decision on third prong as unnecessary to result |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
