EB-1ALife sciences and medicineIndividualDecided February 2025Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
FEB032025_04B2203
AwardsNot metMembershipNot metHigh salaryClaimed, not analyzedJudgingClaimed, not analyzedOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedPublished materialClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
Biomedical researcher seeks EB-1A classification in sciences. Petitioner claimed at least three criteria including awards and membership. AAO found two criteria met by service center but affirmed neither award criterion nor membership was properly established, and concluded no sustained acclaim or top-tier recognition demonstrated.
Official PDF
The official PDF link for this decision is being verified.
Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Grants and patents do not qualify as prizes or awards for excellence; grant not awarded to petitioner
- Membership · Selection as academic advisor does not constitute qualifying association membership
- Final merits · Record does not establish sustained national or international acclaim or top-tier status
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Awards | Not met | Grants and patents do not qualify as prizes or awards for excellence; grant not awarded to petitioner |
 Membership | Not met | Selection as academic advisor does not constitute qualifying association membership |
 High salary | Claimed, not analyzed | Criteria claimed but decision does not analyze this specific evidentiary category |
 Judging | Claimed, not analyzed | Criteria claimed but decision does not analyze this specific evidentiary category |
 Original contributions | Claimed, not analyzed | Criteria claimed but decision does not analyze this specific evidentiary category |
 Published material | Claimed, not analyzed | Criteria claimed but decision does not analyze this specific evidentiary category |
 Scholarly articles | Claimed, not analyzed | Criteria claimed but decision does not analyze this specific evidentiary category |
 Final merits | Not met | Record does not establish sustained national or international acclaim or top-tier status |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.