Outcome: Dismissed
FEB052024_01B2203
Our summary
Physiology researcher sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Petitioner satisfied two criteria (judging and scholarly articles) but claimed only one additional criterion (original contributions). AAO found original contributions insufficiently demonstrated as major significance and dismissed appeal; final merits review not required.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Judging · Director found this criterion satisfied
- Scholarly articles · Director found this criterion satisfied
What was missing
- Original contributions · Petitioner failed to demonstrate research contributions to drug development reached major significance in field
- Final merits · Did not meet initial three-criterion requirement; record does not establish sustained national or international acclaim
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director found this criterion satisfied | |
| Met | Director found this criterion satisfied | |
| Not met | Petitioner failed to demonstrate research contributions to drug development reached major significance in field | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed and waived on appeal; petitioner did not contest Director's award criterion finding | |
| Not met | Did not meet initial three-criterion requirement; record does not establish sustained national or international acclaim |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
