Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1ALife sciences and medicineIndividualDecided February 2024Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

FEB052024_01B2203

JudgingMetScholarly articlesMetOriginal contributionsNot metAwardsClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Physiology researcher sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Petitioner satisfied two criteria (judging and scholarly articles) but claimed only one additional criterion (original contributions). AAO found original contributions insufficiently demonstrated as major significance and dismissed appeal; final merits review not required.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Judging · Director found this criterion satisfied
  • Scholarly articles · Director found this criterion satisfied

What was missing

  • Original contributions · Petitioner failed to demonstrate research contributions to drug development reached major significance in field
  • Final merits · Did not meet initial three-criterion requirement; record does not establish sustained national or international acclaim

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
JudgingMetDirector found this criterion satisfied
Scholarly articlesMetDirector found this criterion satisfied
Original contributionsNot metPetitioner failed to demonstrate research contributions to drug development reached major significance in field
AwardsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed and waived on appeal; petitioner did not contest Director's award criterion finding
Final meritsNot metDid not meet initial three-criterion requirement; record does not establish sustained national or international acclaim

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.