Outcome: Dismissed
FEB102026_05B2203
Our summary
Marketing manager in digital commerce sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO affirmed SCOPS denial, finding petitioner satisfied only two criteria and failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Judging · SCOPS found criterion satisfied; AAO did not disturb this finding.
- Published material · SCOPS found criterion satisfied; AAO did not disturb this finding.
What was missing
- High salary · Petitioner did not provide objective earnings data showing salary high relative to others in field.
- Leading or critical role · Petitioner did not submit documentary evidence that employer has distinguished reputation.
- Final merits · Record does not support sustained national or international acclaim or rise to top of field.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | SCOPS found criterion satisfied; AAO did not disturb this finding. | |
| Met | SCOPS found criterion satisfied; AAO did not disturb this finding. | |
| Not met | Petitioner did not provide objective earnings data showing salary high relative to others in field. | |
| Not met | Petitioner did not submit documentary evidence that employer has distinguished reputation. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; decision notes petitioner has not received major internationally recognized award. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed. | |
| Not met | Record does not support sustained national or international acclaim or rise to top of field. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
