Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AMarketing, media, communicationsIndividualDecided February 2026Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

FEB102026_05B2203

JudgingMetPublished materialMetHigh salaryNot metLeading or critical roleNot metAwardsClaimed, not analyzedExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedMembershipClaimed, not analyzedOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Marketing manager in digital commerce sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO affirmed SCOPS denial, finding petitioner satisfied only two criteria and failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Judging · SCOPS found criterion satisfied; AAO did not disturb this finding.
  • Published material · SCOPS found criterion satisfied; AAO did not disturb this finding.

What was missing

  • High salary · Petitioner did not provide objective earnings data showing salary high relative to others in field.
  • Leading or critical role · Petitioner did not submit documentary evidence that employer has distinguished reputation.
  • Final merits · Record does not support sustained national or international acclaim or rise to top of field.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
JudgingMetSCOPS found criterion satisfied; AAO did not disturb this finding.
Published materialMetSCOPS found criterion satisfied; AAO did not disturb this finding.
High salaryNot metPetitioner did not provide objective earnings data showing salary high relative to others in field.
Leading or critical roleNot metPetitioner did not submit documentary evidence that employer has distinguished reputation.
AwardsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; decision notes petitioner has not received major internationally recognized award.
ExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed.
MembershipClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed.
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed.
Scholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed.
Final meritsNot metRecord does not support sustained national or international acclaim or rise to top of field.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.