Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AFinance and economicsIndividualDecided February 2023Sustained

Outcome: Sustained

FEB162023_01B2203

High salaryMetLeading or critical roleMetScholarly articlesMetOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedPublished materialClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsMet

Our summary

Senior director in business/economics seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability. AAO sustained appeal, finding petitioner met three evidentiary criteria (scholarly articles, leading role, high salary) and demonstrated sustained acclaim at the very top of field through extensive documentation.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • High salary · Petitioner earned $494,749 in 2020, more than three times Level IV economist wage, meeting criterion
  • Leading or critical role · AAO agreed petitioner satisfied leading or critical role for distinguished organizations criterion
  • Scholarly articles · AAO agreed petitioner satisfied authorship of scholarly articles criterion
  • Final merits · AAO found petitioner demonstrated sustained national and international acclaim and achievements recognized through extensive documentation

What was missing

Every criterion in the table was found met.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
High salaryMetPetitioner earned $494,749 in 2020, more than three times Level IV economist wage, meeting criterion
Leading or critical roleMetAAO agreed petitioner satisfied leading or critical role for distinguished organizations criterion
Scholarly articlesMetAAO agreed petitioner satisfied authorship of scholarly articles criterion
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed in findings; AAO did not reach this criterion
Published materialClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed in findings; AAO did not reach this criterion
Final meritsMetAAO found petitioner demonstrated sustained national and international acclaim and achievements recognized through extensive documentation

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.