Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AComputer science and AIEmployerDecided February 2023Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

FEB162023_02B2203

AwardsMetLeading or critical roleMetScholarly articlesMetMembershipNot metOriginal contributionsNot metPublished materialNot metFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Product manager with doctorate in robotics and AI sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. AAO found three criteria met (awards, scholarly articles, leading role) but final merits analysis showed achievements insufficient for sustained national/international acclaim at top of field level.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Awards · Two nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for innovative digital projects
  • Leading or critical role · Beneficiary held leading or critical role for distinguished organization
  • Scholarly articles · Beneficiary authored scholarly articles in IEEE professional publications

What was missing

  • Membership · Petitioner did not assert beneficiary was member of association requiring outstanding achievements
  • Original contributions · Record did not establish original contributions of major significance to field
  • Published material · Record did not establish published material about beneficiary in professional or major media
  • Final merits · Beneficiary's achievements did not rise to level of sustained acclaim or career of acclaimed work

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsMetTwo nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for innovative digital projects
Leading or critical roleMetBeneficiary held leading or critical role for distinguished organization
Scholarly articlesMetBeneficiary authored scholarly articles in IEEE professional publications
MembershipNot metPetitioner did not assert beneficiary was member of association requiring outstanding achievements
Original contributionsNot metRecord did not establish original contributions of major significance to field
Published materialNot metRecord did not establish published material about beneficiary in professional or major media
Final meritsNot metBeneficiary's achievements did not rise to level of sustained acclaim or career of acclaimed work

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.