Outcome: Dismissed
FEB172021_02B2203
Our summary
Digital illustration artist seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Met three evidentiary criteria: published material, judging participation, and exhibition displays. However, on final merits review, AAO found insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim and placement among the very top of the field, dismissing the appeal.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Exhibitions · Work displayed at multiple artistic exhibitions and digital art showcases.
- Judging · Served as jury member for professional art competition.
- Published material · Articles and interviews about petitioner published in professional media.
What was missing
- Awards · No major internationally recognized award established or claimed.
- Final merits · Evidence insufficient to show sustained national or international acclaim at very top of field.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Work displayed at multiple artistic exhibitions and digital art showcases. | |
| Met | Served as jury member for professional art competition. | |
| Met | Articles and interviews about petitioner published in professional media. | |
| Not met | No major internationally recognized award established or claimed. | |
| Not met | Evidence insufficient to show sustained national or international acclaim at very top of field. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
