Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1ABusiness and managementIndividualDecided February 2024Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

FEB202024_01B2203

AwardsNot metLeading or critical roleNot metPublished materialNot metOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A self-described life coach and motivational leader sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed, finding he failed to satisfy three required evidentiary criteria and lacked sustained national or international acclaim required for the highest echelon.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Awards · Awards lack evidence of national or international recognition; missing criteria for selection, process, and field reputation.
  • Leading or critical role · Director found criterion met but AAO reversed, holding petitioner failed to satisfy all elements required.
  • Published material · Submitted material inadequate; publication circulation statistics not established as major media.
  • Final merits · Petitioner has not established sustained national or international acclaim or place among very top of field.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsNot metAwards lack evidence of national or international recognition; missing criteria for selection, process, and field reputation.
Leading or critical roleNot metDirector found criterion met but AAO reversed, holding petitioner failed to satisfy all elements required.
Published materialNot metSubmitted material inadequate; publication circulation statistics not established as major media.
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; Director did not discuss eligibility despite petitioner's assertions.
Final meritsNot metPetitioner has not established sustained national or international acclaim or place among very top of field.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.