Outcome: Dismissed
FEB262020_01B2203
Our summary
Fashion designer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed at least five criteria including judging, exhibitions, published material, critical role, and scholarly articles. AAO found judging and exhibitions met but published material lacked attribution and critical role claim unsupported; petitioner failed to meet three-criterion threshold and lacked sustained acclaim.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Exhibitions · Displayed work at fashion shows
- Judging · Served as jury member evaluating student fashion designs and theses
What was missing
- Leading or critical role · Letters described job accomplishments but not critical role or distinguished organizational reputation
- Published material · Articles lacked required author attribution and publication credentials not established
- Final merits · Insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim or top-tier standing
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Displayed work at fashion shows | |
| Met | Served as jury member evaluating student fashion designs and theses | |
| Not met | Letters described job accomplishments but not critical role or distinguished organizational reputation | |
| Not met | Articles lacked required author attribution and publication credentials not established | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed as separate criterion in decision | |
| Not met | Insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim or top-tier standing |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
