Outcome: Dismissed
FEB262021_07B2203
Our summary
SAP planning specialist employed by biopharmaceutical manufacturer claimed four additional criteria beyond two initially found met. AAO rejected awards, membership, and high salary findings; rejected final merits step finding insufficient sustained acclaim or position at top of field.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Leading or critical role · Director found criterion met; AAO did not disturb this finding
What was missing
- Awards · Awards not nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in field
- High salary · AAO disagreed with Director that criterion was satisfied
- Membership · ASME membership based on years of experience, not outstanding achievements judged by experts
- Final merits · Beneficiary lacks national or international acclaim and does not rank among top echelon in field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director found criterion met; AAO did not disturb this finding | |
| Not met | Awards not nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in field | |
| Not met | AAO disagreed with Director that criterion was satisfied | |
| Not met | ASME membership based on years of experience, not outstanding achievements judged by experts | |
| Not met | Beneficiary lacks national or international acclaim and does not rank among top echelon in field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
