Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AOtherIndividualDecided February 2024Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

FEB272024_01B2203

JudgingMetScholarly articlesMetLeading or critical roleNot metOriginal contributionsNot metMembershipClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

Safety and risk management expert claiming extraordinary ability. Petitioner claimed five criteria; AAO found only two met (judging and scholarly articles). Appeal dismissed because petitioner failed to establish three of ten required criteria and lacked national or international acclaim.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Judging · AAO disagreed with Director and found evidence sufficient
  • Scholarly articles · Director found petitioner met this criterion

What was missing

  • Leading or critical role · Insufficient evidence that division had distinguished reputation
  • Original contributions · Citations insufficient to show major significance in field

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
JudgingMetAAO disagreed with Director and found evidence sufficient
Scholarly articlesMetDirector found petitioner met this criterion
Leading or critical roleNot metInsufficient evidence that division had distinguished reputation
Original contributionsNot metCitations insufficient to show major significance in field
MembershipClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed in decision
Final meritsNot reached / not discussedNot reached because petitioner did not meet three criteria

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.