Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-2 NIWEducation and academiaIndividualDecided February 2024Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

FEB272024_06B5203

Merit and national importanceNot metWell positionedNot reached / not discussedBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

Psychologist self-petitioner claimed national interest waiver for proposed multidisciplinary team providing services to vulnerable youth addressing homelessness. AAO held petitioner failed first Dhanasar prong: showed youth homelessness is nationally important but not that her specific endeavor has prospective impact or differs from existing solutions; lacked business plan and specific operational details.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Merit and national importance · Petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance of specific proposed endeavor addressing youth homelessness; worked in important field but lacked evidence of prospective impact or improvement over existing solutions.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Merit and national importanceNot metPetitioner failed to demonstrate national importance of specific proposed endeavor addressing youth homelessness; worked in important field but lacked evidence of prospective impact or improvement over existing solutions.
Well positionedNot reached / not discussedFirst prong failed; agency declined to reach second prong as unnecessary to outcome.
Balance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussedFirst prong failed; agency declined to reach third prong as unnecessary to outcome.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.