EB-1AArts, design, architectureIndividualDecided 2009Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
Feb022009_04B2203
AwardsClaimed, not analyzedCommercial successClaimed, not analyzedExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedHigh salaryClaimed, not analyzedJudgingClaimed, not analyzedLeading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedMembershipClaimed, not analyzedOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedPublished materialClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot reached / not discussed
Our summary
Artist in the arts seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to identify any erroneous conclusions of law or fact on appeal and submitted no arguments or evidence addressing the regulatory criteria.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
Every criterion in the table was found met.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Awards | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; appellant submitted no arguments or evidence on criteria |
 Commercial success | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; appellant submitted no arguments or evidence on criteria |
 Exhibitions | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; appellant submitted no arguments or evidence on criteria |
 High salary | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; appellant submitted no arguments or evidence on criteria |
 Judging | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; appellant submitted no arguments or evidence on criteria |
 Leading or critical role | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; appellant submitted no arguments or evidence on criteria |
 Membership | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; appellant submitted no arguments or evidence on criteria |
 Original contributions | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; appellant submitted no arguments or evidence on criteria |
 Published material | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; appellant submitted no arguments or evidence on criteria |
 Scholarly articles | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; appellant submitted no arguments or evidence on criteria |
 Final merits | Not reached / not discussed | Appeal dismissed summarily; no analysis of overall extraordinary ability |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.