EB-1ABusiness and managementIndividualDecided 2006Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
Feb212006_01B2203
AwardsClaimed, not analyzedCommercial successClaimed, not analyzedHigh salaryClaimed, not analyzedJudgingClaimed, not analyzedMembershipClaimed, not analyzedOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedPublished materialClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
Business operations specialist self-petitioner in real estate sought EB-1A classification. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner submitted only personal statements and character letters without addressing any of ten regulatory criteria and failed to document sustained national or international acclaim.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Final merits · No criteria evidence submitted; record does not establish national acclaim for property management
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Awards | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; no evidence submitted addressing regulatory criteria |
 Commercial success | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; no evidence submitted addressing regulatory criteria |
 High salary | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; no evidence submitted addressing regulatory criteria |
 Judging | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; no evidence submitted addressing regulatory criteria |
 Membership | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; no evidence submitted addressing regulatory criteria |
 Original contributions | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; no evidence submitted addressing regulatory criteria |
 Published material | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; no evidence submitted addressing regulatory criteria |
 Scholarly articles | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; no evidence submitted addressing regulatory criteria |
 Final merits | Not met | No criteria evidence submitted; record does not establish national acclaim for property management |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.