Outcome: Dismissed
NOV162005_21B2203
Our summary
A construction designer self-petitioned for EB-1A extraordinary ability, claiming awards, membership, judging, and exhibitions. The AAO found none of the criteria adequately supported, noting incomplete competition results, local-only membership standards, unverified judging role, and unsubstantiated gallery claims. Overall evidence failed the top percentile requirement.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · No evidence of official comprehensive competition results for 2002 competition provided
- Exhibitions · No evidence of regular display at exclusive national venues; gallery existence unsubstantiated
- Judging · No evidence of judging activities at national or international level of established professionals
- Membership · Association membership based on employment or activity, not outstanding achievement as essential condition
- Final merits · Fewer than three criteria met; evidence insufficient to establish sustained national or international acclaim
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | No evidence of official comprehensive competition results for 2002 competition provided | |
| Not met | No evidence of regular display at exclusive national venues; gallery existence unsubstantiated | |
| Not met | No evidence of judging activities at national or international level of established professionals | |
| Not met | Association membership based on employment or activity, not outstanding achievement as essential condition | |
| Not met | Fewer than three criteria met; evidence insufficient to establish sustained national or international acclaim |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
