Outcome: Dismissed
JAN052026_02B2203
Our summary
Art history professor and researcher claimed extraordinary ability under EB-1A. Met three initial criteria: published material, judging, and scholarly articles. AAO dismissed on final merits, finding insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the small percentage at the very top of the field.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Judging · SCOPS determined and AAO confirmed petitioner met judging criterion.
- Published material · AAO concluded petitioner satisfies published material criterion.
- Scholarly articles · SCOPS determined and AAO confirmed petitioner met authorship of scholarly articles criterion.
What was missing
- Awards · No major, internationally recognized award received or claimed.
- Final merits · Limited media coverage since late 2023, minimal peer review invitations, and limited evidence of sustained national or international acclaim fail to establish top percentage status.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | SCOPS determined and AAO confirmed petitioner met judging criterion. | |
| Met | AAO concluded petitioner satisfies published material criterion. | |
| Met | SCOPS determined and AAO confirmed petitioner met authorship of scholarly articles criterion. | |
| Not met | No major, internationally recognized award received or claimed. | |
| Not met | Limited media coverage since late 2023, minimal peer review invitations, and limited evidence of sustained national or international acclaim fail to establish top percentage status. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
