Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AArts, design, architectureIndividualDecided 2020Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JUL232020_03B2203

AwardsMetExhibitionsMetJudgingMetPublished materialMetLeading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Photographer sought EB-1A classification. Satisfied four evidentiary criteria but AAO dismissed appeal, finding record did not establish sustained national or international acclaim or placement among small percentage at very top of field despite prizes and judging work.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Awards · Director found criterion met
  • Exhibitions · Director found criterion met; labeled as display criterion
  • Judging · Director found criterion met
  • Published material · Director found criterion met

What was missing

  • Final merits · Petitioner did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or ranking among small percentage at top of field

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsMetDirector found criterion met
ExhibitionsMetDirector found criterion met; labeled as display criterion
JudgingMetDirector found criterion met
Published materialMetDirector found criterion met
Leading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedPetitioner claimed on appeal but AAO declined detailed analysis given insufficient final merits showing
Final meritsNot metPetitioner did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or ranking among small percentage at top of field

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.