Outcome: Dismissed
JUL232020_03B2203
Our summary
Photographer sought EB-1A classification. Satisfied four evidentiary criteria but AAO dismissed appeal, finding record did not establish sustained national or international acclaim or placement among small percentage at very top of field despite prizes and judging work.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Awards · Director found criterion met
- Exhibitions · Director found criterion met; labeled as display criterion
- Judging · Director found criterion met
- Published material · Director found criterion met
What was missing
- Final merits · Petitioner did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or ranking among small percentage at top of field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director found criterion met | |
| Met | Director found criterion met; labeled as display criterion | |
| Met | Director found criterion met | |
| Met | Director found criterion met | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Petitioner claimed on appeal but AAO declined detailed analysis given insufficient final merits showing | |
| Not met | Petitioner did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or ranking among small percentage at top of field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
