Outcome: Dismissed
JAN182023_01B2203
Our summary
Scientist with Ph.D. in biomedical sciences sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. Met two of three required criteria (judging and scholarly articles). AAO rejected original contributions claim; publications and citations alone insufficient to prove major significance. Appeal dismissed for failure to meet three-criteria threshold.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Judging · Service Center and AAO agreed petitioner satisfied judging criterion.
- Scholarly articles · Service Center and AAO agreed petitioner satisfied authorship of scholarly articles criterion.
What was missing
- Original contributions · Evidence shows incremental contributions, not major significance; publications alone insufficient without proof of major field impact.
- Final merits · Record does not support sustained national or international acclaim or membership in top small percentage.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Service Center and AAO agreed petitioner satisfied judging criterion. | |
| Met | Service Center and AAO agreed petitioner satisfied authorship of scholarly articles criterion. | |
| Not met | Evidence shows incremental contributions, not major significance; publications alone insufficient without proof of major field impact. | |
| Not met | Record does not support sustained national or international acclaim or membership in top small percentage. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
