Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-2 NIWLaw, policy, social scienceIndividualDecided January 2024Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JAN182024_01B5203

Merit and national importanceNot metWell positionedNot reached / not discussedBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

Legal consultant with advanced degree sought NIW for EB-2 classification. Petitioner claimed national importance of proposed endeavor assisting businesses with international trade and market entry. AAO held specific endeavor lacked sufficient prospective economic impact; job creation and tax revenue from legal consulting did not meet national importance threshold.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Merit and national importance · Substantial merit established but national importance not demonstrated; legal consulting services lacked prospective impact on field or economy commensurate with national importance.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Merit and national importanceNot metSubstantial merit established but national importance not demonstrated; legal consulting services lacked prospective impact on field or economy commensurate with national importance.
Well positionedNot reached / not discussedFirst prong failed; decision declined to reach third prong as matter of discretion.
Balance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussedFirst prong failed; decision declined to reach third prong as matter of discretion.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.