EB-1AArts, design, architectureEmployerDecided 2017Sustained
Outcome: Sustained
JAN272017_01B2203
ExhibitionsMetHigh salaryMetLeading or critical roleMetPublished materialMetFinal meritsMet
Our summary
An architect with over 25 years experience sought EB-1A classification. The AAO found four criteria met: published material, exhibitions, leading role for distinguished organization, and high salary. The aggregate evidence demonstrated sustained national acclaim and placement among the very top of the field.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Exhibitions · Work exhibited at professional architectural events showcasing projects.
- High salary · Annual compensation of $250,000 high relative to field per Labor Department data.
- Leading or critical role · Project director and lead architect for distinguished organization with major projects.
- Published material · Articles about petitioner and projects in major publications and trade journals.
- Final merits · Extensive coverage over two decades, awards, distinguished role, sustained acclaim demonstrated.
What was missing
Every criterion in the table was found met.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Exhibitions | Met | Work exhibited at professional architectural events showcasing projects. |
 High salary | Met | Annual compensation of $250,000 high relative to field per Labor Department data. |
 Leading or critical role | Met | Project director and lead architect for distinguished organization with major projects. |
 Published material | Met | Articles about petitioner and projects in major publications and trade journals. |
 Final merits | Met | Extensive coverage over two decades, awards, distinguished role, sustained acclaim demonstrated. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.