Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1ASports and athleticsIndividualDecided 2013Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JAN312013_02B2203

JudgingMetScholarly articlesMetLeading or critical roleNot metOriginal contributionsNot metPublished materialNot metFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

An exercise and sport psychology professional filed self-petition seeking EB-1A classification. Director found two criteria met. Petitioner contested three other criteria on appeal but failed to establish three criteria minimum. AAO affirmed dismissal; petitioner not demonstrated to be at very top of field.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Judging · Director found petitioner met participation as judge criterion.
  • Scholarly articles · Director found petitioner met authorship of scholarly articles criterion.

What was missing

  • Leading or critical role · Petitioner failed to establish leading or critical role for organizations.
  • Original contributions · Petitioner failed to demonstrate original contributions of major significance.
  • Published material · Petitioner failed to establish published material about alien in major media.
  • Final merits · Petitioner met only two criteria; failed three-criterion threshold for extraordinary ability in exercise and sport psychology.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
JudgingMetDirector found petitioner met participation as judge criterion.
Scholarly articlesMetDirector found petitioner met authorship of scholarly articles criterion.
Leading or critical roleNot metPetitioner failed to establish leading or critical role for organizations.
Original contributionsNot metPetitioner failed to demonstrate original contributions of major significance.
Published materialNot metPetitioner failed to establish published material about alien in major media.
Final meritsNot metPetitioner met only two criteria; failed three-criterion threshold for extraordinary ability in exercise and sport psychology.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.