Outcome: Dismissed
JUL012025_02B2203
Our summary
A businessman with business degrees and twenty years international experience sought EB-1A classification. He claimed seven criteria and met three: awards, judging, and leading role. The AAO affirmed these three but dismissed the appeal because he lacked sustained acclaim in the United States after 2021, falling short of extraordinary ability.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Awards · Petitioner established receipt of Excellence in Economics badge for social and economic development contributions.
- Judging · SCOPS determination accepted; petitioner met this criterion.
- Leading or critical role · SCOPS determination accepted; petitioner met this criterion.
What was missing
- Final merits · Petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim after relocating to United States in 2021.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Petitioner established receipt of Excellence in Economics badge for social and economic development contributions. | |
| Met | SCOPS determination accepted; petitioner met this criterion. | |
| Met | SCOPS determination accepted; petitioner met this criterion. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; decision did not reach this criterion. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; decision did not reach this criterion. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; decision did not reach this criterion. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; decision did not reach this criterion. | |
| Not met | Petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim after relocating to United States in 2021. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
