Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AMarketing, media, communicationsIndividualDecided 2019Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JUL022019_01B2203

AwardsMetJudgingMetLeading or critical roleMetPublished materialMetScholarly articlesMetFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A journalist claimed extraordinary ability through five criteria, meeting at least three via awards, publications, judging, and a leadership role. The AAO found the evidentiary criteria satisfied but dismissed the appeal because the totality of evidence, particularly the awards, demonstrated only local and regional recognition rather than the sustained national or international acclaim required.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Awards · Director found petitioner met awards criterion; AAO did not disturb this finding
  • Judging · Participated as juror selecting journalism award recipients
  • Leading or critical role · Performed leading or critical role for organization with distinguished reputation
  • Published material · Articles published about petitioner in professional and major media outlets
  • Scholarly articles · Director found petitioner met scholarly articles criterion

What was missing

  • Final merits · Awards lacked evidence of national or international recognition; mostly local or regional

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsMetDirector found petitioner met awards criterion; AAO did not disturb this finding
JudgingMetParticipated as juror selecting journalism award recipients
Leading or critical roleMetPerformed leading or critical role for organization with distinguished reputation
Published materialMetArticles published about petitioner in professional and major media outlets
Scholarly articlesMetDirector found petitioner met scholarly articles criterion
Final meritsNot metAwards lacked evidence of national or international recognition; mostly local or regional

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.