Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AHealthcare, clinicalIndividualDecided July 2022Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JUL072022_01B2203

Scholarly articlesMetAwardsNot metMembershipNot metOriginal contributionsNot metCommercial successClaimed, not analyzedExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedHigh salaryClaimed, not analyzedJudgingClaimed, not analyzedLeading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedPublished materialClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Weight loss center operator sought extraordinary ability classification. Met only one of four claimed criteria. AAO found insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim or demonstration of career of acclaimed work in health and wellness field.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Scholarly articles · Director found met; AAO agreed this was the only criterion satisfied

What was missing

  • Awards · Awards were local or regional; petitioner failed to show national or international recognition
  • Membership · Petitioner failed to show organizations require outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts
  • Original contributions · Petitioner failed to demonstrate major significance or field-wide impact of contributions
  • Final merits · Evidence does not show sustained national or international acclaim at top of field

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Scholarly articlesMetDirector found met; AAO agreed this was the only criterion satisfied
AwardsNot metAwards were local or regional; petitioner failed to show national or international recognition
MembershipNot metPetitioner failed to show organizations require outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts
Original contributionsNot metPetitioner failed to demonstrate major significance or field-wide impact of contributions
Commercial successClaimed, not analyzedCriterion not claimed
ExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedCriterion not claimed
High salaryClaimed, not analyzedCriterion not claimed
JudgingClaimed, not analyzedCriterion not claimed
Leading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedCriterion not claimed
Published materialClaimed, not analyzedCriterion not claimed
Final meritsNot metEvidence does not show sustained national or international acclaim at top of field

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.