Outcome: Dismissed
JUL072022_01B2203
Our summary
Weight loss center operator sought extraordinary ability classification. Met only one of four claimed criteria. AAO found insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim or demonstration of career of acclaimed work in health and wellness field.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Scholarly articles · Director found met; AAO agreed this was the only criterion satisfied
What was missing
- Awards · Awards were local or regional; petitioner failed to show national or international recognition
- Membership · Petitioner failed to show organizations require outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts
- Original contributions · Petitioner failed to demonstrate major significance or field-wide impact of contributions
- Final merits · Evidence does not show sustained national or international acclaim at top of field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director found met; AAO agreed this was the only criterion satisfied | |
| Not met | Awards were local or regional; petitioner failed to show national or international recognition | |
| Not met | Petitioner failed to show organizations require outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts | |
| Not met | Petitioner failed to demonstrate major significance or field-wide impact of contributions | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Criterion not claimed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Criterion not claimed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Criterion not claimed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Criterion not claimed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Criterion not claimed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Criterion not claimed | |
| Not met | Evidence does not show sustained national or international acclaim at top of field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
