Outcome: Dismissed
JUL142017_01B2203
Our summary
Professional boxer in Italy and United States sought extraordinary ability classification. Claimed four criteria but satisfied only awards. AAO found membership not sufficiently documented, leading role not established, and aggregate evidence insufficient for sustained acclaim and top-tier status required for EB-1A.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Awards · Director found and AAO concurred petitioner meets this criterion
What was missing
- Leading or critical role · Role selecting athletes and training at gym not shown to be leading or critical to organizations
- Membership · Membership claims not sufficiently documented; committees not comprised of recognized national or international experts
- Final merits · Review of record in aggregate does not support extraordinary ability level of expertise
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director found and AAO concurred petitioner meets this criterion | |
| Not met | Role selecting athletes and training at gym not shown to be leading or critical to organizations | |
| Not met | Membership claims not sufficiently documented; committees not comprised of recognized national or international experts | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; decision does not address this criterion substantively | |
| Not met | Review of record in aggregate does not support extraordinary ability level of expertise |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
