Outcome: Dismissed
JUL152025_01B2203
Our summary
Content developer and influencer from Brazil sought extraordinary ability classification. Claimed six criteria. Decision found only one criterion met and withdrew SCOPS finding on exhibitions. Appeal dismissed because petitioner failed to satisfy three required criteria.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Published material · Decision affirmed published material criterion as satisfied
What was missing
- Awards · Subscriber-based awards lack evidence of wider recognition; metrics alone insufficient
- Exhibitions · Decision withdrew SCOPS finding; criterion not met on de novo review
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Decision affirmed published material criterion as satisfied | |
| Not met | Subscriber-based awards lack evidence of wider recognition; metrics alone insufficient | |
| Not met | Decision withdrew SCOPS finding; criterion not met on de novo review | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; decision focuses on other criteria | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; decision focuses on other criteria | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; decision focuses on other criteria | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; discussion incomplete in condensed text | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Did not reach final merits; insufficient initial criteria met |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
