Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AHealthcare, clinicalIndividualDecided June 2026Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JUN172026_04B2203

JudgingMetLeading or critical roleMetPublished materialMetScholarly articlesMetHigh salaryClaimed, not analyzedOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Medical health services manager seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO affirmed USCIS finding of four criteria met but held petitioner failed final merits determination; lacks career of sustained acclaimed work and evidence of recognition at very top of field.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Judging · USCIS found petitioner judged work of others in field meets criterion.
  • Leading or critical role · USCIS found petitioner held leading or critical role in organization with distinguished reputation meets criterion.
  • Published material · USCIS found materials published about petitioner or his work meets criterion.
  • Scholarly articles · USCIS found petitioner authored scholarly articles in professional publications meets criterion.

What was missing

  • Final merits · Petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or career of acclaimed work; peer review participation does not show elite status.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
JudgingMetUSCIS found petitioner judged work of others in field meets criterion.
Leading or critical roleMetUSCIS found petitioner held leading or critical role in organization with distinguished reputation meets criterion.
Published materialMetUSCIS found materials published about petitioner or his work meets criterion.
Scholarly articlesMetUSCIS found petitioner authored scholarly articles in professional publications meets criterion.
High salaryClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; AAO focused on final merits determination rather than determining all evidentiary criteria.
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; AAO focused on final merits determination rather than determining all evidentiary criteria.
Final meritsNot metPetitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or career of acclaimed work; peer review participation does not show elite status.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.