An AI researcher self-petitioning for EB-1A extraordinary ability. Claimed six evidentiary criteria and final merits assessment. AAO found only two criteria met (judging and scholarly articles), falling short of the required three. Record lacks evidence of major significance, widespread influence, or national acclaim necessary for extraordinary ability classification.

A senior lead consultant sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner met only one of the needed three exceptional ability criteria, with salary and recognition evidence insufficient. It therefore did not reach the waiver analysis under the Dhanasar framework.

An airline pilot sought EB-2 classification as exceptional ability and NIW waiver. The AAO found the petitioner failed to satisfy at least three evidentiary criteria for exceptional ability and did not establish that the proposed endeavor of working as a commercial airline pilot had national importance. Appeal dismissed.

Self-petitioner integration architect in energy efficiency claiming extraordinary ability. Advanced three criteria on appeal; failed original contributions as major significance not demonstrated beyond employer context. AAO dismissed appeal because claimed criteria insufficient and aggregate record lacks sustained acclaim.