Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-2 NIWLaw, policy, social scienceIndividualDecided 2026Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JUL302026_02B5203

Merit and national importanceNot metWell positionedNot reached / not discussedBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

An attorney proposed work as a professional mediator through her own company. The AAO dismissed the appeal, holding the applicant failed the first prong because individual mediation services lacked national importance; she provided no expert evidence showing field-wide impact or connection to national initiatives.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Merit and national importance · Mediation and consulting services benefit individual clients; lacks demonstrated regional or national field impact.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Merit and national importanceNot metMediation and consulting services benefit individual clients; lacks demonstrated regional or national field impact.
Well positionedNot reached / not discussedFirst prong failed; second prong not reached as dispositive of appeal.
Balance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussedFirst prong failed; third prong not reached as dispositive of appeal.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.