Outcome: Dismissed
JUL302026_02B5203
Our summary
An attorney proposed work as a professional mediator through her own company. The AAO dismissed the appeal, holding the applicant failed the first prong because individual mediation services lacked national importance; she provided no expert evidence showing field-wide impact or connection to national initiatives.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Merit and national importance · Mediation and consulting services benefit individual clients; lacks demonstrated regional or national field impact.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Mediation and consulting services benefit individual clients; lacks demonstrated regional or national field impact. | |
| Not reached / not discussed | First prong failed; second prong not reached as dispositive of appeal. | |
| Not reached / not discussed | First prong failed; third prong not reached as dispositive of appeal. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
