A patent attorney seeking self-employment as affordable patent counsel for innovators and small businesses claimed national importance based on USPTO innovation initiatives. The AAO held the endeavor lacks national importance because it would benefit only individual clients, not impact patent law broadly, and requires substantial positive economic effects beyond individual benefit.

Franchise business manager sought NIW for consulting company helping franchises scale. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacked national importance. Projected employment of four to thirty-one workers and profits of approximately five hundred sixty-two thousand dollars were insufficient relative to industry scale.

An advanced degree professional sought EB-2 national interest waiver for work improving oil and gas extraction processes. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacked substantial merit and national importance due to inconsistent and vague descriptions of specific plans and insufficient evidence of prospective economic effects.

Computer systems consultant and entrepreneur sought NIW for EB-2. He proposed consulting services with claimed job creation and revenue projections. AAO held the specific endeavor remained vague and lacked prospective national impact; projected revenue and job creation insufficient to establish national importance.