EB-1ABusiness and managementEmployerDecided 2005Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
JUN032005_17B2203
AwardsNot metPublished materialNot metFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
Employer petitioned for beneficiary, senior business executive in sales and marketing, for extraordinary ability. AAO rejected company awards and comparable evidence claim under regulation inapplicable to business field. Multiple applicable criteria existed; evidence insufficient to meet three required criteria.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Awards not presented to beneficiary individually for excellence; company awards do not qualify
- Published material · No published materials primarily about beneficiary; petitioner attempted invalid comparable evidence
- Final merits · Failed to establish sustained national or international acclaim or position within small percentage at top
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Awards | Not met | Awards not presented to beneficiary individually for excellence; company awards do not qualify |
 Published material | Not met | No published materials primarily about beneficiary; petitioner attempted invalid comparable evidence |
 Final merits | Not met | Failed to establish sustained national or international acclaim or position within small percentage at top |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.