Aircraft mechanic self-petitioner claimed exceptional ability under EB-2 and sought national interest waiver. AAO affirmed denial because petitioner failed to establish by preponderance of evidence that expertise was significantly above ordinary in field, and thus did not qualify for underlying EB-2 classification required for NIW eligibility.

AI researcher sought EB-2 NIW classification claiming exceptional ability. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner met only two of three required criteria for exceptional ability: official academic record and professional association membership, but not recognition for achievements and significant contributions in AI field.

Operation manager in food retail sought EB-2 classification as individual of exceptional ability with NIW. AAO held she failed to demonstrate exceptional ability by meeting at least three evidentiary criteria, and therefore did not establish underlying EB-2 eligibility; Dhanasar prongs not addressed.

Entrepreneur with supervisory and management experience sought NIW for exceptional ability classification. AAO dismissed because petitioner failed to meet the three exceptional ability criteria and, on final merits, did not demonstrate expertise significantly above peers. National importance of proposed endeavor was also unestablished.