Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-2 NIWLaw, policy, social scienceEmployerDecided June 2026Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JUN112026_01B5203

Merit and national importanceNot metWell positionedNot reached / not discussedBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

An assistant professor of sociology seeking EB-2 with NIW claimed her research on criminal justice reform technology has national importance. The AAO found her endeavor has substantial merit but lacks the specific prospective national impact required under Dhanasar, dismissing the appeal.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Merit and national importance · Endeavor has substantial merit but lacks demonstrated national importance; research impact non-specific

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Merit and national importanceNot metEndeavor has substantial merit but lacks demonstrated national importance; research impact non-specific
Well positionedNot reached / not discussedNot reached because first prong failed; no decision made on this criterion
Balance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussedNot reached because first prong failed; no decision made on this criterion

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.