Outcome: Dismissed
JUN172025_02B5203
Our summary
A lawyer and legal entrepreneur in self-petitioner status sought EB-2 with NIW. The applicant claimed substantial merit and national importance for a legal practice advising startups and cybersecurity. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance: the business plan lacked specificity about economic impact, job creation, or projected benefits; merely working in an important field is insufficient.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Merit and national importance · Petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance; law practice lacks substantial economic impact or national-level effects required by Dhanasar framework.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance; law practice lacks substantial economic impact or national-level effects required by Dhanasar framework. | |
| Not reached / not discussed | First prong failure precludes analysis of remaining prongs under Dhanasar framework. | |
| Not reached / not discussed | First prong failure precludes analysis of remaining prongs under Dhanasar framework. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
