Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-2 NIWLaw, policy, social scienceIndividualDecided June 2025Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

JUN172025_02B5203

Merit and national importanceNot metWell positionedNot reached / not discussedBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

A lawyer and legal entrepreneur in self-petitioner status sought EB-2 with NIW. The applicant claimed substantial merit and national importance for a legal practice advising startups and cybersecurity. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance: the business plan lacked specificity about economic impact, job creation, or projected benefits; merely working in an important field is insufficient.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Merit and national importance · Petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance; law practice lacks substantial economic impact or national-level effects required by Dhanasar framework.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Merit and national importanceNot metPetitioner failed to demonstrate national importance; law practice lacks substantial economic impact or national-level effects required by Dhanasar framework.
Well positionedNot reached / not discussedFirst prong failure precludes analysis of remaining prongs under Dhanasar framework.
Balance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussedFirst prong failure precludes analysis of remaining prongs under Dhanasar framework.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.