EB-1AArts, design, architectureIndividualDecided 2009Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
Jul062009_03B2203
AwardsNot metExhibitionsNot metFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
An artist petitioned for EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. She claimed awards and exhibitions criteria, submitting evidence of finalist selection and acceptance into a national juried art exhibition. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding neither criterion met and that the evidence does not establish sustained national or international acclaim required for this highly restrictive classification.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Finalist selection without monetary award does not meet nationally or internationally recognized prize requirement
- Exhibitions · Acceptance into national juried exhibition insufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim
- Final merits · Evidence does not show petitioner among small percentage at very top of field of endeavor
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Awards | Not met | Finalist selection without monetary award does not meet nationally or internationally recognized prize requirement |
 Exhibitions | Not met | Acceptance into national juried exhibition insufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim |
 Final merits | Not met | Evidence does not show petitioner among small percentage at very top of field of endeavor |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.