Outcome: Dismissed
Jun232009_01B2203
Our summary
Mixed media artist self-petitioner claimed extraordinary ability in arts, met published materials and exhibitions criteria but failed to meet required third criterion. AAO affirmed denial, finding insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim at very top level.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Exhibitions · Work displayed at artistic exhibitions or showcases
- Published material · Director found petitioner meets published materials criterion
What was missing
- Awards · Awards were academic or limited to academy students; residencies and fellowships insufficient for criterion
- Final merits · Despite meeting two criteria, evidence shows talent but insufficient to establish top-level sustained acclaim
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Work displayed at artistic exhibitions or showcases | |
| Met | Director found petitioner meets published materials criterion | |
| Not met | Awards were academic or limited to academy students; residencies and fellowships insufficient for criterion | |
| Not met | Despite meeting two criteria, evidence shows talent but insufficient to establish top-level sustained acclaim |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
