Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AArts, design, architectureEmployerDecided 2012Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

Jul312012_03B2203

AwardsNot metFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Master hair designer's petitioner claimed at least three regulatory criteria for EB-1A extraordinary ability. AAO held petitioner failed to provide required certified translations of award documents and did not meet the threshold of three qualifying evidentiary categories, dismissing the petition.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Awards · Petitioner failed to submit certified translations of foreign language award documentation as required
  • Final merits · Petitioner failed to satisfy regulatory requirement of three types of qualifying evidence

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsNot metPetitioner failed to submit certified translations of foreign language award documentation as required
Final meritsNot metPetitioner failed to satisfy regulatory requirement of three types of qualifying evidence

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.