Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AArts, design, architectureEmployerDecided 2009Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

Jun052009_02B2203

JudgingNot metPublished materialNot metFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

An arts field professional represented by counsel claimed extraordinary ability through published material and judging participation. The AAO rejected published material as lacking complete translations and appearing in insufficient outlets, and found judging role did not evidence top-level sustained acclaim. Aggregate evidence insufficient.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Judging · Participation as judge not evaluated as meeting sustained national or international acclaim
  • Published material · Articles incomplete, translations uncertified, and publication scope insufficient for major media
  • Final merits · Aggregate evidence does not distinguish petitioner as within small percentage at top

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
JudgingNot metParticipation as judge not evaluated as meeting sustained national or international acclaim
Published materialNot metArticles incomplete, translations uncertified, and publication scope insufficient for major media
Final meritsNot metAggregate evidence does not distinguish petitioner as within small percentage at top

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.